An Important Note for Mobile Users:
To view the complete course navigation panel, please rotate your device to landscape mode.
Syndication Due-Diligence for (LPs) Passive Investors
Course Homepage | 2) Understanding the Deal | 2.2 Market Selection
INVESTOR EDUCATION
In case you haven’t had experience with real estate investing and went straight to real estate syndication, here’s a quick overview of evaluating market potential taken from our Remote Rental eCourse. Owning rental properties is not a prerequisite to investing in a real estate syndication, but it does help educate passive investors at spotting sucker deals because they have some real world experience or context to rely on.
It is up to you as the passive investors to do the upfront due diligence to make an informed decision when a deal sponsor is using market trends and mentions in their business plan that they are investing in “The #1 fastest growing city.”
Use the city data website to help you find the real estate market data below.
San Francisco, Hawaii, Los Angeles, Seattle, Boston are examples of primary markets which are NOT ideal for passive income cash flow investing.
The syndicated real estate deal could appreciate to increase the equity multiple but I consider that gambling. Sophisticated investors invest in cash flow where the rents exceed the mortgage plus expenses (and enough money to pay for professional property management to do our dirty work). A lot of this concept is explained in the Keynesian Beauty Contest theory, where only the top competitors get the most notoriety but the best real estate syndication deal picks are hidden in the field. So part of the game is staying away from the “dumb” amateur money.
A good passive investor takes a look at the Rent-to-Value Ratio and looks for at least 1% or more to be able to cash flow after expenses. You find the Rent-to-Value Ratio by taking the monthly rent and dividing it by the purchase price. For example, a $100,000 home that rents for 1,000 a month would have a Rent-to-Value Ratio of 1%. Most people I work with live in primary markets (as opposed to Birmingham, Atlanta, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Memphis, Little Rock, Jacksonville, Ohio, or other secondary or tertiary markets) where the Rent-to-Value Ratios are under 1%. Plus we invest in red states so we have good landlord laws on our side too.
Market Selection is Key to Investment Success – Passive investors should focus on emerging markets with strong population and income growth, rather than relying on speculation in primary markets like San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Boston.
Rent-to-Value Ratio Determines Cash Flow Potential – A rent-to-value (RTV) ratio of at least 1% is ideal for ensuring positive cash flow after expenses. A sophisticated investor will avoid low RTV markets where rents don’t sufficiently exceed mortgage and operating costs.
Beware of Misleading “Fastest-Growing” Claims – An experienced syndicator may promote a market for a multifamily syndication deal as “the fastest-growing,” but every individual must verify population growth (20%+), income growth (30%+), and home value increases (40%+) to confirm long-term viability.
Neighborhood-Level Due Diligence Matters – Every real estate investor should analyze specific neighborhood data, not just city or state-level trends. Key metrics include household income ($40K-$70K), poverty rates (<20%), and unemployment rates (not exceeding the city’s rate by more than 2%).
Invest in Landlord-Friendly States – Markets in red states tend to have stronger landlord protections, reducing the risk of tenant-friendly policies that can impact eviction timelines and rent collection.
Avoid Speculative Investing – Sophisticated investors prioritize cash flow and market conditions over appreciation-based investing, avoiding areas dominated by “dumb amateur money” that chase speculative price gains.