An Important Note for Mobile Users:
To view the complete course navigation panel, please rotate your device to landscape mode.
Syndication Due-Diligence for (LPs) Passive Investors
Course Homepage | 3) Passive Investor Due-Diligence Part 1: People | 3.5 People Due-Diligence FAQ
INVESTOR EDUCATION
Numbers in the examples on this page are hypothetical and for illustration only. Return targets are not guarantees, and investors can lose money.
BELOW ARE LIMITED PARTNER INVESTORS’ QUESTIONS FROM PREVIOUS REAL ESTATE SYNDICATION DEALS WITH SLIGHT CHANGES TO PRESERVE THEIR PRIVACY. THE SPECIFICS ARE BY NO MEANS TYPICAL SINCE THEY ARE FROM A WIDE RANGE OF DEALS AND BY NO MEANS TYPICAL, HOWEVER, IT ALLOWS INVESTORS TO GAIN INSIGHTS FROM FELLOW LIMITED PARTNER INVESTORS.
Yes, we plan to invest alongside our fellow investors. We already have around $130K that the syndication team has put into the deal (deposits, etc.) that is “hard” and committed. The deal sponsor will be at least 10% of the closing capital. The $1.3m is what we’re aiming to have in total for closing, but our actual cash to close and raise is slightly lower (~$1.1-1.2m). This accounts for closing costs, and fees, and ensures we have the additional working capital to start. (Cash to close is lower because a lot of times the bank may not require all the Cap Ex money to be in the bank at the very start)
This is a great hybrid play with a proven model to increase rents in a strong market. The deal is “clean” and we can come in and do little and still cashflow.
It is only for sponsors who don’t take their comp up front. It’s a tax thing. (This term is present in some deals and not in others. It is mainly for tax use for the sponsors to get taxed accordingly. In many syndications, equity is allocated per unit which can be purchased by investors. For example in an 80% GP /20% LP deal there might be 800 units up for purchase and 200 units given to the GP as their carried interest in running the deal.)
This is called a cash or capital call. The cash reserves serve as a buffer for such an event. Oftentimes, in order to “save face” additional cash is asked from the Key Principals of General Partners, but yes it is possible to have a cash call from LPs however unlikely.
That’s exactly why you do these deals. The investment goes through some vacancy but overall still cashflows until occupancy drops to 70%. This is where I would like to be in a downturn in the economy.
There are roles that we signed up for, however, it’s fluid and in the end, all of our brands are on the line for the sake of the investment and team.
4 parts of a deal that shape a guideline on who gets what:
1) Who is bringing the funding
2) Who is doing the work
3) Who found the deal
4) Whose experience/network is being leveraged
A good starting point is evenly weighing those at 25% each but it’s very subjective.
These contacts are through the property manager, who manages the process with the different trades. We will still get other outside bids after closing to make sure we’re getting the best price/service.
We have other contacts in the area through other relationships and because the sponsor team already owns assets in this area as well.
No. Residents pay their own electricity and water is billed back. Residents are also charged a Trash and Pest fee.
I have four of my rentals within a few miles of this apartment. I don’t think any of mine are currently section 8, but I am a real fan of it. What you have to worry about is the LIDCA, LURA, or LURK restrictions on rent. Sometimes they have credits to builders when they build these and that is a real pain to deal with if you are the best buyer. I have not met anyone who has specialized in repositioning these because you have to be really careful with the expiration date. It’s usually something brokers trick you into buying.
The exact percentage has been around 8% total Section 8. A handful of those are carryover from the previous owner and long-term residents (5+ yrs). The property currently doesn’t rely on it to maintain or attract tenants and is not high enough for us, in general, to be too concerned outside of normal resident churn. One good thing is the property has actually been getting the current asking rent from the Section 8 residents. There are always some units not repositioned to leave some meat for the next buyer, so I’m sure naturally these will be it.
Personally, I pay no attention to Sales comps. It’s something brokers always put in Offering Packages to fill space. These apartments are commercial assets and valued on NOI, not SF, Units, or comps. As for the rents take a look at the graph in the webinar.
We are just doing a 7.8% increase. Anything over 15% is too high.
Their business plan was to take from 70% occupancy to this point.
The current seller has owned for about 2.5 years and has a shorter-term business model when he buys properties. He is focused on large value-add with more legwork. He tends to get short-term variable financing, work on distressed properties, etc. He’s taken this particular property to this point and is ready to take gains and move to the next. He’s looking for new deals like us.
This is due diligence that you need to do on your own and check out City Data and crime websites. I have owned 4 properties on this side of Atlanta. It’s not the greatest area but definitely not the Southside (Along the Marta) which is where you do not want to be.
I am working on a scorecard as I’m getting a little (loose) on how I view these deals where it’s more off heuristics and seeing so many I know exactly what to look for. Which is terrible for communicating with others. I realize that “I just know” is not a good answer and so is “trust me” as it does not work with everyone. Plus, I’m always afraid that I will forget it, much like the motivation behind the podcast is to memorialize this.
Using the rubric of 50% operator and 50% deal…
We have the rent rolls and do an audit. We are looking for abnormalities, but everything so far looks like a typical hodgepodge. In the end, it works its way out to be a wash because if you have a lot of vacancies at the beginning of ownership, it can be good cause you “rip the band-aid off quickly” and get a jump start on rehabs/end business plan. And if you have to wait 3-6 months for a bulk of the vacancies to come then you get better cashflow in the interim. With a large property like 300+ units, it dilutes the risk that you are considering here.
Yes. There were no big surprises, other than some minor deferred maintenance for we are able to get a $25,000 credit for. Unit interiors need some repairs, but again nothing major. All of this has been accounted for in our underwriting.
We are oversubscribed meaning people have committed funds but are in the process of signing docs and wiring in funds. There is still time to get in, but email me ASAP.
Likely Check. Checks are easier especially because people move around so much. But we can do ACH if the bank allows it.
Not really, especially for such a small position. In my opinion, it does not happen and if you think you need the money back, do not invest and please save everyone the hassle. This is one of the reasons sponsors don’t typically bring in lower net-worth individuals and non-accredited investors into these deals.
Rehab is done with natural turnover in order to optimize cash flow. In some investments, there are a lot of vacancies which expedites rehab. However, there is a big hurt on cash flow during that period.
If the total raise was 1.3 million, your $30K investment is 2.3%. But since it’s an 80% LP / 20% GP split, you own 1.8%. But 1.8% of 114 units is 2.1 units.
100% return means if you invested $100K, if you added up your proceeds from cashflow paid quarterly and money from the sale/refi you would walk away with $100k and your original $100k.
The normal 5-year hold is because it takes two years to get all the rehab units done, two years to get the culture to change and further bump rents, and the final year to stabilize the books for the new buyer. Of course, this is a conservative projection.
All deals are pretty much paid up and financials are rolled up on a quarterly basis starting around the half-year mark as we force bad tenants out and stabilize after the takeover. It has to do with minimizing admin and being cost-effective. This is the case for Class B traditional equity. For Class A (debt) investors, we pay monthly and from the first month.
We could sell or refi earlier (years 3-4) or even after years 5-6. It is unlikely we would hold past 8-10 years. It’s based on how much returns we can squeeze out of the asset with the least amount of risk. We monitor the market and try to make the best decision for everyone… this is why it is good to be aligned with a performance split with the sponsor.
Not on this one particular project. It acts like a debt investment – no depreciation. More for regular equity investors.
I might have made a general statement, but most investors follow a bit of progression where they start out looking for cashflow and then look for higher gains (no cashflow) but in the very endgame (or over 4-6M net worth) they just want a fixed return that the debt investment yields. Here is a short video in our new Mastermind Syndication Secrets series coming out soon discussing this progression of an investor’s mindset. In a structure like this, the sponsor usually aims to pay out Class A investors once the property can be refinanced, which shifts more of the upside to Class B. When that happens depends on the market and is not guaranteed; a 2-5 year window is a common target.
Class A gets paid in the first month so it’s pretty instant feedback (again Class B investors are projected to wait a couple quarters and then should be paid on a quarterly basis). Class B gets the upside in the deal, so that is the tradeoff. Most investors will get the Class B unless they have a higher net worth or really want cash flow.
A Class (debt investors) is more for conservative and very high net-worth investors. It’s a 10% return starting right away paid monthly, but no upside. Plus we try and cash out those investors out of the deal as soon as we can (2-4 years). Class B investors are traditional equity who have a split of the profits but will likely have to wait a couple of quarters to start getting quarterly distributions.
We continue to cashflow. If we hold longer, we will refinance and basically pull all your initial investment so you are still cash flowing with none of your initial investment, so you are playing with house money at that point on.
Yes, the more money the property makes the more money you make. If we make just $25 more per unit it means huge dollars for us!!! You take 80% of all profits. When the property is really performing well above a 14% IRR the GP takes 25% of profits and LPs take 75%.
Using the Hedonova scam as a case study:
Smart LPs Ask the Right Questions – The best-limited partners don’t just wire funds. They dig into roles, risks, capital structures, and past performance. Asking thoughtful questions separates real investors from hobbyists.
Transparency Builds Trust – Whether it’s confirming sponsor co-investment, verifying incentive structures, or clarifying risk plans in a downturn, transparency from the operator is non-negotiable. A sponsor that dodges specifics is a red flag.
Cash Calls Are Rare… But Possible – While uncommon, LPs should know that capital calls can happen. Strong deals build in reserves and typically lean on GPs first, but investors should be mentally prepared.
Know the Property, Know the Market – Section 8 mix, HVAC systems, re-tenanting ease, and nearby development all play into performance. A good LP doesn’t just underwrite the spreadsheet—they understand the tenants and the neighborhood.
Track Record and Communication Matter – Slick websites and fake PR mean nothing if the operator can’t back it up. Do they answer your emails? Can you find their real name online? If not, walk away.
Class A vs. Class B – Understand the tradeoffs: Class A is for high net worth folks seeking fixed income and early exit; Class B is traditional equity with upside, longer timeline, and more volatility. Match your strategy to your stage of wealth.
Exit Strategy Drives Everything – The 5-year hold is a guideline, not a guarantee. Good operators flex based on market conditions, keeping investor returns at the forefront. Refi, sell, or hold—all should be on the table.
Red Flags Are Real – Hedonova is a case study of what happens when LPs don’t do basic due diligence. Lack of online presence, inflated AUM, fake teams, and paid vanity awards? Hard pass.
Ask the “Dumb” Questions – They’re not dumb. Questions about comps, school districts, or trash fees might seem small, but they give you a window into how the operator thinks and whether they’re detail-oriented or dismissive.
This isn’t just real estate—it’s a business. And as an LP, you’re not just along for the ride. You’re a partner.

How I Lost $40,000 as a Passive LP Investor
Saying NO to a measly $300 a month & Networking on Facebook – Brent Kawakami
This is educational content, not tax, legal, or investment advice. We are not attorneys, CPAs, or financial planners. Please let us know if you need a referral to a 💼 CPA, ⚖️ Lawyer, or other vendor here.
Talk it through with us
Questions on “People Due-Diligence FAQ” as you look at real deals? Join The Wealth Elevator investor community and bring them to your onboarding call.
Join the club and book your onboarding callJoining is free.

The podcast behind this course
The Wealth Elevator Podcast
Lane's show for accredited investors on passive syndications, taxes and alternative investments. Many of the lessons in this course started as episodes.
Listen on Apple PodcastsWatch on YouTube