Oil eCourse > Appendix
Appendix to the free 7-lesson course · Course home
This page is built for both people and AI-assisted due diligence. Read it directly, search it for a keyword, or paste sections into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity or another AI tool to organize your questions and risks before you review a deal. New field notes are added after each episode of the Oil & Gas Energy Investing podcast. It is educational only and is not tax, legal, securities or investment advice.
Unless you are a strange person or have too much time on your hands, you’re probably never going to read this entire dossier. Practical options would be using the search function for the right keywords, but ideally use the copy and paste into your favorite AI chat and use it to assist you with the right starting knowledge. Of course, this is no replacement for professional advice, but I think it’s a great start to get educated, and I hope to see you at a future Wealth Elevator event!
I am an accredited investor reviewing a passive alternative investment. Using the information I already provided in this chat, act as a skeptical but fair due diligence assistant.
Please help me identify:
1. The main investment thesis
2. The strongest reasons this could work
3. The biggest risks or blind spots
4. The assumptions that need to be verified
5. The questions I should ask before investing
6. What information is missing
7. Whether this investment seems more suitable for cash flow, tax benefits, appreciation, or asymmetric upside
Do not assume the sponsor’s projections are accurate. Separate facts, assumptions, opinions, and marketing claims.
Using the information I loaded into this chat, review this investment opportunity like a skeptical investor who is trying to avoid making an emotional decision.
Please identify:
1. Any red flags
2. Any yellow flags that require more follow-up
3. Any claims that sound overly promotional
4. Any risks that may be underexplained
5. Any conflicts of interest
6. Any fees, incentives, or assumptions that deserve extra scrutiny
7. The top 10 questions I should ask before moving forward
Be direct and practical. I would rather be warned early than surprised later.
Based on the investment information I provided, create a due diligence question list organized by audience.
Please separate the questions into:
1. Questions for the sponsor, operator, or founder
2. Questions for my CPA
3. Questions for my attorney
4. Questions for myself as the investor
5. Questions about downside scenarios
6. Questions about reporting, liquidity, fees, and exits
Make the questions specific, not generic. Prioritize the questions that could reveal whether this is a good deal, a mediocre deal, or a deal I should avoid.
Using the information already loaded into this chat, help me evaluate whether this investment fits my goals as a passive accredited investor.
Please analyze:
1. Whether this investment is mainly for income, tax benefits, growth, diversification, or upside
2. What type of investor this may be appropriate for
3. What type of investor should probably avoid it
4. How this compares to real estate, private credit, oil and gas, angel investing, or public market investing
5. The likely holding period and liquidity limitations
6. The main ways I could lose money
7. The main follow-up questions I need answered before making a decision
Give me a practical investor-fit summary at the end.
Using the information I loaded into this chat, create a one-page investment memo for this opportunity.
Organize it into:
1. Executive summary
2. Investment thesis
3. Potential upside
4. Key risks
5. Tax considerations
6. Sponsor, operator, or founder considerations
7. Deal structure
8. Fees and incentives
9. Open questions
10. Final diligence checklist
Do not make a recommendation to invest. Instead, summarize what is known, what is assumed, what is missing, and what must be verified before making a decision.
Short background on what passive oil and gas investing is and why accredited investors look at it. The full walkthrough is in the free Oil & Gas eCourse.
A passive investor funds a share of the cost of drilling and operating wells, run by an operator, and receives a share of production income. A direct working interest is the version that passes drilling deductions through. See Lesson 2: Where your money goes.
Mainly because a properly structured working interest is one of the few passive investments whose deductions can offset active income such as W-2 or business income. See Lesson 1: Is oil right for you?
Direct working interests, royalty interests and trusts, MLPs, and public stocks and ETFs each pass through different tax benefits and liquidity. See the comparison table in Lesson 5: Ways to own oil.
The core deductions are intangible drilling costs, depreciation on equipment, percentage depletion and the QBI deduction. Confirm every figure with your CPA.
Non-salvageable drilling costs, usually 70% to 90% of a well’s cost, deductible in the year paid if funded by December 31 and spudded within 90 days. See Lesson 3: The tax benefits.
Oil and gas investments can serve different investor objectives, and investors should be careful not to confuse them. Some deals are structured around tax benefits, especially intangible drilling costs. Others may be more focused on current cash flow from existing producing wells. These are not the same strategy.
A deal that blends in preexisting wells may look attractive because cash flow can begin sooner, but those wells may not provide the same tax profile as new drilling activity. On the other hand, a tax-oriented drilling deal may offer larger upfront deductions, but the investor may be taking more uncertainty around drilling results, timing, production, and commodity prices.
This is where investors need to clarify their own objective before evaluating the deal. If the goal is tax mitigation, the structure and availability of deductions matter. If the goal is income, production history and cash flow timing matter. If the goal is commodity exposure, price assumptions and downside cases matter. A deal can be attractive for one purpose and still be poorly matched for a different investor’s needs.
Equipment such as casing, wellheads and tanks is depreciated, and bonus depreciation can speed that up depending on when it’s placed in service. See Lesson 3.
Small producers can deduct 15% of gross production income, within limits, and the K-1 should report a working interest as non-passive. See Lesson 4 for the questions to ask your CPA.
Global pricing, OPEC policy, spare capacity and crude quality all affect what an operator is paid for each barrel. The notes below come from the podcast. See Lesson 6.
Oil investors should distinguish between production, gross exports, and net exports. A region may produce or export a large amount of oil, but if much of that oil is consumed internally, less supply is actually available to the global market.
The episode highlights North America as a useful example. North America has significant oil exports, but the speaker points out that net exports are much lower because domestic consumption absorbs a large share of production. That matters because global pricing pressure is often tied to the barrels that are truly available for export, not just the barrels produced.
This is a practical diligence issue. Sponsors may cite broad macro statistics about U.S. energy production, global supply, or oil demand. Passive investors should push deeper. Who are the major net exporters? Which consuming regions depend on those barrels? What happens if a major route is disrupted? Is the sponsor’s return model driven by production performance, tax deductions, commodity price appreciation, or all three?
The more an offering depends on a bullish oil macro story, the more investors should examine the underlying assumptions.
OPEC should not be understood as a group that directly sets the retail price of gasoline. Its power comes from coordinating oil production targets among member countries and, through OPEC+, coordinating with additional producers such as Russia. That distinction matters for passive investors because oil prices are still shaped by global demand, regional consumption, transportation capacity, storage, refining constraints, and market expectations.
A passive investor in a U.S. oil deal may be investing in wells located in Texas, California, Colorado, or another domestic basin, but the deal is still exposed to global commodity pricing. OPEC can influence supply by tightening or loosening production targets, but it does not control how much oil China, India, Europe, or the United States consumes. The practical diligence takeaway is to avoid treating OPEC headlines as automatic price forecasts. Instead, investors should ask how the operator’s model handles commodity volatility, what price deck is used, and whether the deal still works if OPEC announcements do not translate into actual barrels delivered.
One of the most useful investor lessons from the episode is that a production target is not the same thing as oil delivered to market. A country can announce a higher quota or production adjustment, but that does not mean supply instantly appears. Oil still has to be extracted, transported, shipped, insured, refined, and delivered to buyers. Infrastructure constraints, geopolitical conflict, refinery bottlenecks, storage limits, and tanker availability can all create delays.
This matters because oil markets often react to announcements before physical supply changes. The speaker compares this to investors watching central bank signals: the announcement matters, but the mechanics underneath determine what actually happens. Passive oil investors should be skeptical of simple claims like “OPEC is increasing production, so oil prices must fall” or “OPEC is cutting production, so oil prices must rise.” The better question is whether the announced supply can realistically reach the market, how quickly it can arrive, and whether the specific oil and gas deal being reviewed depends on optimistic assumptions about that timing.
OPEC and OPEC+ are important oil-market signals, but investors should not treat them as mechanical price controls. OPEC refers to the original group of oil-exporting countries that coordinate around production policy, while OPEC+ includes additional producers such as Russia. When these groups announce production cuts or increases, the market pays attention because coordinated supply decisions can influence expectations. But the announcement is only the first layer. Political incentives, member compliance, infrastructure limits, shipping routes, spare capacity, and national self-interest all determine whether those targets become actual barrels delivered to market.
The UAE’s 2026 exit from OPEC is a useful example. The investor lesson is not simply “more supply means lower oil prices.” The deeper lesson is that producer alliances only work when members believe the quota system still serves their own interests. When a major producer wants more flexibility, it can weaken confidence in coordinated supply discipline.
The episode also raises a useful investor habit: watch what sophisticated capital actually does, not just what public messaging says. Large institutions may talk about energy transition while still allocating to oil, natural gas, infrastructure, and related real assets. That observation does not make oil automatically attractive, but it should prompt better questions. A macro headline may support a thesis, but deal-level underwriting still matters more: operator quality, cost basis, production timing, tax treatment, price assumptions, and downside cases.
Spare capacity is one of the most important concepts for oil investors to understand. It refers to how much additional oil can be brought online relatively quickly. When spare capacity is high, the oil market may be better able to absorb disruptions. When spare capacity is limited, geopolitical events, wars, shipping constraints, or supply interruptions can create more severe price volatility.
The episode makes this point in practical terms: oil is not a faucet. Bringing production online can require capital, planning, operating capability, and confidence that the well or production system will remain active long enough to justify the cost. For investors in diversified oil-well portfolios, this is one reason diversification across wells, regions, and operators may matter. A single production issue may be less damaging in a broader pool, but that does not eliminate commodity or execution risk. Passive investors should ask how much of the projected return depends on new production coming online, whether the operator has contingency plans, and what happens if supply is delayed or shut in.
Oil should not be evaluated as if every barrel is identical. Crude quality, transportation access, refinery compatibility, and processing requirements can all affect the price a project actually realizes.
The episode raises a practical question: if North America produces and exports oil, why does it still import crude from Central and South America? The answer is not simply supply shortage. Different crude types fit different refinery systems. Some refineries are built to process heavier crude, while much U.S. shale production may be lighter. Infrastructure cannot always switch quickly or cheaply from one crude slate to another.
For passive investors, this creates a diligence point that is easy to overlook. A sponsor may show a broad WTI or Brent oil price assumption, but the project’s realized price may be lower after transportation costs, quality differentials, basis adjustments, and buyer-specific deductions.
Investors should ask what type of crude is expected, what benchmark is used, what deductions apply between benchmark and realized price, who buys the production, and whether the operator has existing takeaway or refinery relationships.
Oil and gas investments should not be evaluated as purely domestic supply stories. Even if the United States produces a large amount of oil, U.S. investors and consumers are still exposed to global energy pricing. Buyers in Europe, Asia, California, and other markets compete for the same commodity, and disruptions involving sanctions, tanker routes, or chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz can affect pricing far outside the conflict zone.
This matters because oil exposure can work differently from stocks, bonds, or real estate, but it is not isolated from the broader economy. Higher commodity prices may help certain oil and gas investments, while also feeding into transportation costs, construction costs, inflation, and interest-rate pressure. For investors who also own real estate or private credit, this is not just an energy issue. It can affect financing costs, operating expenses, and asset values across the rest of the portfolio.
Geopolitical risk should be treated as part of oil and gas underwriting, not as background noise. Wars, sanctions, tanker routes, and chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz can affect supply chains, pricing, and investor sentiment. These events can create opportunity when investors are fearful, but they can also expose weak underwriting when a deal depends on overly optimistic commodity assumptions.
A useful distinction is the difference between having a macro thesis and having a good deal. An investor may believe energy demand will remain strong over the next decade and still overpay for a specific project. Cost basis, operator quality, production assumptions, tax profile, and downside scenarios still matter.
The practical warning is that fear alone does not make an opportunity attractive. A geopolitical disruption may create a better entry point if the deal was underwritten conservatively before prices moved higher. But if the operator adjusts assumptions upward after the headline event, the investor may simply be buying into the excitement at a worse basis. In oil and gas, contrarian timing only helps if the underwriting remains disciplined.
Producing wells usually keep flowing at low prices, but distributions move with a global price you don’t control. See Lesson 6.
Many passive investors are attracted to U.S. oil and gas investments because domestic drilling may come with tax benefits. That tax framing can make the investment feel local, tangible, and somewhat insulated from foreign events. The problem is that oil pricing is not local. It is part of a global commodity market.
A U.S. drilling project may still be affected by production decisions, export disruptions, geopolitical tension, and shipping-route risk in regions far from the well site. The episode uses the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz as practical examples. If oil cannot move efficiently from a major exporting region to large consuming markets such as China, India, Japan, South Korea, or Europe, the pricing impact can ripple across global markets.
For passive investors, this means the diligence should not stop at the tax benefits, operator deck, or domestic location. Investors should ask how the project is underwritten against commodity price volatility, whether distributions depend on sustained high oil prices, and whether the sponsor explains downside pricing scenarios instead of only emphasizing tax deductions and upside production assumptions.
Oil and gas diligence should not stop at production volume. One of the more overlooked risks is that “oil is not just oil.” Different crude types, such as light sweet crude and heavy sour crude, require different handling, processing, and refining infrastructure.
Modern U.S. shale production often produces lighter crude, while some foreign supply sources, including Venezuela and parts of the Middle East, are commonly associated with heavier crude. That distinction matters because refineries are not always interchangeable. If a refinery is designed for heavy sour crude and that supply is disrupted by sanctions, political instability, or transportation constraints, the bottleneck may appear at the refining level rather than the drilling level.
For passive investors, this means the question is not simply, “Is there oil?” The better question is, “Can this specific oil be economically produced, transported, refined, and sold?” Investors who only look at production headlines may miss infrastructure risk, regional dependency, or pricing pressure caused by crude-type mismatches.
The operator’s track record and capitalization matter more than almost anything else in the deal. See Lesson 7: How to vet a deal.
Wells can come in below expectations even in known fields, and exploration carries more dry-hole risk than development drilling. See Lesson 6.
There’s generally no secondary market, and selling a profitable interest early can trigger recapture under IRC Sections 1245 and 1254. See Lesson 6.
Questions grouped by who you ask. The full lists are in Lessons 4 and 7.
Start with track record, acreage, well type, IDC split and price assumptions. See Lesson 7.
Projected returns in oil and gas deals should not be compared at face value unless the underlying commodity assumptions are normalized. Two offerings can show similar target returns, but one may assume $55–$60 oil while another assumes $80–$85 oil. Those are not the same risk profile.
This is similar to multifamily underwriting. A real estate operator can make a deal look stronger by assuming an aggressive exit cap rate. In oil and gas, the same thing can happen through optimistic price-per-barrel assumptions, production timing, or break-even assumptions. The headline return may be the “magic number,” but the assumptions underneath determine whether the projection is conservative, reasonable, or stretched.
Passive investors should ask what oil price is used in the base case, what break-even price is required to avoid loss, when production begins, when cash flow is expected to start, and what happens if oil prices decline materially. The goal is not to predict oil perfectly. The goal is to understand how much optimism is already baked into the deal before comparing it to other opportunities.
Investors who come from multifamily often prefer smaller, hungry sponsors because they tend to be nimble, carry lower overhead, and offer better terms. That preference does not carry over cleanly to drilling. Larger producers usually control more contiguous acreage, hold deeper production data on the surrounding wells, run more sophisticated equipment, and have the capital that complex horizontal drilling requires. A small independent may negotiate a friendlier split, but better terms rarely make up for weaker acreage, technology, or operating capability. I ran into this on my first oil investment in 2019, a six-well program drilled to roughly 4,100 feet with a small independent operator in Texas. Before spending time on deal structure, ask the sponsor how much acreage they control and whether it is contiguous, how many wells they have drilled in that formation, what production data they are working from, and whether they operate the wells themselves.
Well count is also a weak measure of diversification. Six wells with one operator using one drilling strategy behave like a single bet, because the same team, the same acreage, and the same technical approach sit behind every one of them. Ask how many operators, formations, and drilling approaches your capital is spread across, and treat a multi-well program from a single operator as one position when sizing the investment.
Ask how the loss will be treated, how the excess business loss limit and your state apply, and when K-1s arrive. Full list in Lesson 4.
Ask about general partner liability, insurance, indemnification, the conversion to limited partner and how to hold the interest. Full list in Lesson 4.
The complete checklist is in Lesson 7.
Know the tax year and income you’re offsetting, your maximum investment, and how you’ll hold the interest.
Read the tax, general partner election, insurance and indemnification sections, and note the base-case oil price.
Have your CPA and attorney sign off, confirm the spud schedule, and verify wiring instructions by phone.
New takeaways from the Oil & Gas Energy Investing podcast that don’t fit a section above are added here after each episode.
This is educational content, not investment, tax or legal advice. We are not attorneys, CPAs or financial planners. Tax law changes and results depend on your situation; consult your own CPA and attorney. Private investments are illiquid and carry risk, including loss of capital. Offerings are available only to accredited investors and only through offering documents. Please let us know if you need a referral to a 💼 CPA, ⚖️ lawyer or other vendor here.
Want to work through a real deal with other accredited investors? Join The Wealth Elevator investor community and book your onboarding call with us.
Join the club and book your onboarding callJoining is free.

The podcast behind this course
A monthly show for passive accredited investors on drilling, taxes, operators and the oil market. Many of the lessons here started as episodes.
Listen on Apple PodcastsWatch on YouTubeThis is educational content, not investment, tax or legal advice. We are not attorneys, CPAs or financial planners. Tax law changes and results depend on your situation; consult your own CPA and attorney. Private investments are illiquid and carry risk, including loss of capital. Offerings are available only to accredited investors and only through offering documents. Please let us know if you need a referral to a 💼 CPA, ⚖️ lawyer or other vendor here.